Hewitt v. United States
View Official PDFBelow are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in Hewitt v. United States and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).
Summary
A short, plain-English overview of Hewitt v. United States.
The Supreme Court reviewed whether the First Step Act's more lenient penalties apply to vacated sentences under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Petitioners argued that their vacated sentences should not be considered 'imposed' for purposes of the Act. The Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's decision, which had denied the application of the Act's penalties.
Holding
The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in Hewitt v. United States.
The Court held that the judgment is reversed, and the cases are remanded.
Constitutional Concepts
These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in Hewitt v. United States. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.
-
Why Ex Post Facto is relevant to Hewitt v. United States
The case involves the retroactive application of the First Step Act's more lenient penalties to sentences imposed before the Act's enactment.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)Petitioners argued they were entitled to retroactive application of the Act's more lenient penalties because a vacated prior sentence is not a sentence that 'has . . . been imposed' for purposes of § 403(b).
-
Why Void for Vagueness is relevant to Hewitt v. United States
The case references a prior decision where the definition of 'crime of violence' was found to be unconstitutionally vague, affecting the petitioners' convictions.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)In 2019, the Court held that the 'crime of violence' definition the Government routinely used to support some § 924(c) convictions was unconstitutionally vague.
-
Why Procedural Due Process is relevant to Hewitt v. United States
The case involves the procedural fairness of applying new sentencing guidelines to vacated sentences.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)The District Court then vacated the impacted § 924(c) convictions, as well as petitioners' sentences.
Key Quotes
Short excerpts from the syllabus in Hewitt v. United States that support the summary and concepts above.
The First Step Act eliminated this harsh mandatory minimum penalty.
Petitioners argued they were entitled to retroactive application of the Act's more lenient penalties.
The District Court disagreed and resentenced petitioners under the pre-Act sentencing scheme.