Points Plus

← Back to Cases

Preemption — related Supreme Court cases

This page groups Supreme Court cases that involve the constitutional concept “Preemption”. Use it to explore related decisions and see how the same idea shows up across different cases.

“Preemption” is:

Federal law overriding or displacing state law.

Source: Article VI Where this concept definition/label comes from (for example, a constitutional provision or a reference framework).

Cases

These are cases where this concept was identified as relevant. Click a case to view its summary, holding, and supporting syllabus excerpts.

  • Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel 22nd April 2026
    The case involves federal removal statutes potentially preempting state court jurisdiction, which is a form of preemption.
  • Hencely v. Fluor Corp. 22nd April 2026
    The Court's holding focused on whether federal law preempts state-law tort claims against military contractors.
  • Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish 17th April 2026
    The case discusses whether federal duties preempt state court jurisdiction under the federal officer removal statute.
  • Berk v. Choy 20th January 2026
    The case involves the issue of whether a federal rule of procedure preempts a state law requirement in federal court.
  • Martin v. United States 12th June 2025
    The Court addressed whether the Supremacy Clause provides a defense in FTCA suits, which involves preemption principles.
  • Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos 5th June 2025
    The case involves the application of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which preempts certain state and federal lawsuits against gun manufacturers.
  • Williams v. Reed 21st February 2025
    The Court held that federal law under § 1983 preempts state laws that effectively immunize state officials from federal claims.
  • Moyle v. United States 27th June 2024
    The case involves a conflict between federal law (EMTALA) and state law (Idaho's abortion restrictions), with the Court addressing whether federal law preempts state law.
  • Snyder v. United States 26th June 2024
    The Court discusses the potential for federal law to override state regulations, which is a key aspect of preemption.
  • Cantero v. Bank of America, N. A. 30th May 2024
    The case primarily concerns whether New York's law is preempted by federal law, specifically the National Bank Act as interpreted in conjunction with Dodd-Frank.
  • Brown v. United States 23rd May 2024
    The case discusses the relationship between federal and state drug definitions and how federal law impacts state convictions under ACCA.
  • Smith v. Spizzirri 16th May 2024
    The case involves the Federal Arbitration Act, which preempts state law by requiring federal courts to stay proceedings pending arbitration.
  • Ohio Adjutant General’s Dept. v. FLRA 18th May 2023
    The decision implies federal law preempts state law regarding the employment and labor relations of dual-status technicians.
  • Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta 29th June 2022
    The Court analyzed whether federal law preempts state jurisdiction in Indian country.
  • United States v. Washington 21st June 2022
    The case centers on whether Washington's law is preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause.
  • Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana 15th June 2022
    The case primarily deals with whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts a California rule.
  • Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas 15th June 2022
    The Court examines whether federal law, specifically the Restoration Act, preempts Texas state gaming laws on tribal lands.
  • Gallardo v. Marstiller 6th June 2022
    The case involves the interpretation of federal Medicaid statutes and whether they preempt state law regarding the recovery of medical expenses from settlement funds.
  • Morgan v. Sundance, Inc. 23rd May 2022
    The decision addresses the federal policy under the FAA and its impact on state and federal court procedures.
  • McGirt v. Oklahoma 9th July 2020
    The decision involves federal law overriding state law concerning jurisdiction over crimes in Indian country under the Major Crimes Act.
  • Sharp v. Murphy 9th July 2020
    The decision implies federal law preempts state jurisdiction over crimes in Indian country, reinforcing federal authority.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *