Points Plus

← Back to Cases

Standing — related Supreme Court cases

This page groups Supreme Court cases that involve the constitutional concept “Standing”. Use it to explore related decisions and see how the same idea shows up across different cases.

“Standing” is:

Requirements that determine who has the right to bring a case in federal court.

Source: Article III Where this concept definition/label comes from (for example, a constitutional provision or a reference framework).

Cases

These are cases where this concept was identified as relevant. Click a case to view its summary, holding, and supporting syllabus excerpts.

  • First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport 29th April 2026
    The Court's decision hinges on whether First Choice has standing to sue, which involves determining if there is a present injury to its First Amendment rights.
  • Chiles v. Salazar 31st March 2026
    The case discusses whether Ms. Chiles had Article III standing to pursue her challenge, which is a threshold issue in federal court cases.
  • Olivier v. City of Brandon 20th March 2026
    The case involves whether Olivier has the right to bring a case seeking prospective relief without challenging his prior conviction.
  • Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections 14th January 2026
    The Court's decision primarily revolves around whether Congressman Bost has standing to challenge the election rules.
  • Gutierrez v. Saenz 26th June 2025
    The Court's decision hinges on whether Gutierrez has standing to bring his § 1983 claim, which is a fundamental aspect of the case.
  • FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. 20th June 2025
    The Court's decision hinges on whether the retailers are considered 'adversely affected' and thus have standing to challenge the FDA's decision.
  • Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA 20th June 2025
    The case primarily revolves around whether the fuel producers have Article III standing to challenge the EPA's approval of California's regulations.
  • NRC v. Texas 18th June 2025
    The Court's decision hinges on whether Texas and Fasken have the right to seek judicial review, which involves the constitutional concept of standing.
  • Rivers v. Guerrero 12th June 2025
    The Court addresses whether Rivers has standing to challenge the transfer of his second habeas application.
  • Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos 5th June 2025
    The case involves the ability of the Mexican government to bring a lawsuit in U.S. courts, which implicates standing issues.
  • Cunningham v. Cornell Univ. 17th April 2025
    The Court discusses the requirements for plaintiffs to state a claim, which is related to the concept of standing and the right to bring a case.
  • Royal Canin U. S. A. v. Wullschleger 15th January 2025
    The case addresses who has the right to have their case heard in federal court, which is related to the concept of standing.
  • Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors 1st July 2024
    The case discusses when a plaintiff has standing to bring an APA claim, focusing on when the injury occurs.
  • Murthy v. Missouri 26th June 2024
    The Court's decision primarily focused on whether the plaintiffs had Article III standing to seek injunctive relief.
  • FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine 13th June 2024
    The Court's decision focused on whether the plaintiffs had Article III standing to challenge the FDA's actions.
  • Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. 6th June 2024
    The Court's decision hinges on whether Truck Insurance Exchange is a 'party in interest' with standing to object to the reorganization plan.
  • Yegiazaryan v. Smagin 22nd June 2023
    The case discusses whether Smagin has the standing to bring a RICO claim based on a 'domestic injury.'
  • Haaland v. Brackeen 15th June 2023
    The Court discusses whether the parties have standing to bring certain claims, particularly in relation to equal protection and nondelegation challenges.
  • Polselli v. IRS 18th May 2023
    The case discusses who has the right to bring a motion to quash an IRS summons, which is related to the concept of standing.
  • Reed v. Goertz 19th April 2023
    The Court addressed whether Reed had standing to bring his procedural due process claim.
  • Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP 23rd June 2022
    The case addresses whether North Carolina's legislative leaders have the right to intervene in the litigation, which is a question of standing.
  • Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana 15th June 2022
    The Court discusses the standing requirements under PAGA and how they are affected by arbitration agreements.
  • Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco 15th June 2022
    The case involves the question of whether the petitioners should have been permitted to intervene in the litigation, which is related to standing and the right to participate in a case.
  • Garland v. Gonzalez 13th June 2022
    The decision addresses whether the district courts had jurisdiction to grant relief to a class, implicating standing and the ability to seek judicial intervention.
  • Federal Election Comm’n v. Ted Cruz 16th May 2022
    The Court discusses whether the appellees have standing to challenge the enforcement of Section 304.
  • Houston Community College System v. Wilson 24th March 2022
    The Court discusses whether Mr. Wilson had standing to bring a First Amendment claim based on the censure.
  • Cameron v. EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P. S. C. 3rd March 2022
    The case addresses the procedural issue of whether the Attorney General had the right to intervene in the appeal, which relates to who has the right to bring or continue a case in court.
  • Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson 10th December 2021
    The issue of standing is addressed as Mr. Dickson moved to dismiss, claiming that the petitioners lacked standing to sue him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *