Points Plus

← Back to Cases

Substantive Due Process — related Supreme Court cases

This page groups Supreme Court cases that involve the constitutional concept “Substantive Due Process”. Use it to explore related decisions and see how the same idea shows up across different cases.

“Substantive Due Process” is:

Limits on government action that infringe fundamental rights or liberty interests.

Source: Fifth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment Where this concept definition/label comes from (for example, a constitutional provision or a reference framework).

Cases

These are cases where this concept was identified as relevant. Click a case to view its summary, holding, and supporting syllabus excerpts.

  • Chiles v. Salazar 31st March 2026
    The case involves the regulation of professional conduct and speech, which can implicate substantive due process rights related to personal autonomy and professional practice.
  • Klein v. Martin 26th January 2026
    The Court's analysis includes whether the nondisclosure of evidence was material enough to undermine confidence in the verdict, implicating substantive due process.
  • Mahmoud v. Taylor 27th June 2025
    The case involves the substantive due process rights of parents to direct the upbringing of their children.
  • Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton 27th June 2025
    The case involves balancing the rights of adults to access certain speech against the state's interest in protecting minors, implicating substantive due process considerations.
  • United States v. Skrmetti 18th June 2025
    The case involved substantive due process considerations related to the rights of transgender minors to receive medical treatment.
  • Perttu v. Richards 18th June 2025
    The case touches on substantive rights related to the ability to file grievances and seek redress, which are intertwined with the merits of the First Amendment claim.
  • A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School Dist. No. 279 12th June 2025
    The Court's analysis touches on the rights of disabled children to receive appropriate educational accommodations, implicating substantive due process protections.
  • Delligatti v. United States 21st March 2025
    The case involves the interpretation of what constitutes a 'crime of violence' under federal law, which implicates substantive due process principles regarding the definition and application of criminal statutes.
  • Fischer v. United States 28th June 2024
    The Court's decision reflects a concern for substantive due process by ensuring that the statute is not applied in a manner that is overly broad or punitive beyond legislative intent.
  • City of Grants Pass v. Johnson 28th June 2024
    The Court discusses the limits of what a state may criminalize, touching on substantive due process principles.
  • Department of State v. Munoz 21st June 2024
    The Court examined whether Muñoz had a fundamental liberty interest in residing with her noncitizen spouse in the U.S., which would be protected under substantive due process.
  • Vidal v. Elster 13th June 2024
    The decision involves evaluating the substantive rights under the First Amendment in the context of trademark law.
  • Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization 24th June 2022
    The Court's decision centers on whether the Constitution confers a right to obtain an abortion under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
  • New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen 23rd June 2022
    The decision involves substantive due process as it addresses fundamental rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez 13th June 2022
    The case touches on the substantive due process issue of indefinite detention without a bond hearing.
  • Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson 10th December 2021
    The petitioners allege that S. B. 8 violates the Federal Constitution, implicating substantive due process rights related to abortion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *