Points Plus

← Back to Cases

Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania

Docket: 19-431 Decision Date: 2020-07-08
View Official PDF
This links to the official slip opinion PDF.
How to read this page

Below are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).

Summary

A short, plain-English overview of Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania.

The Supreme Court addressed whether the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury had the authority to issue religious and moral exemptions from the contraceptive mandate under the ACA. The Court found that the Departments had such authority and that the rules were procedurally valid under the APA. The decision reversed the Third Circuit's ruling, which had affirmed a preliminary nationwide injunction against the implementation of the final rules.

Holding

The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania.

The Court held that the Departments had the authority under the ACA to promulgate the religious and moral exemptions.

Constitutional Concepts

These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.

  • Why Free Exercise of Religion is relevant to Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania

    The case involves exemptions from contraceptive coverage based on religious beliefs, implicating the Free Exercise Clause.

    Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)
    Religious entities challenged the rules under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA).
  • Why Administrative Law is relevant to Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania

    The case addresses the authority of federal agencies to promulgate rules and exemptions under the ACA, which involves administrative law principles.

    Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)
    The Departments had the authority under the ACA to promulgate the religious and moral exemptions.
  • Why Procedural Due Process is relevant to Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania

    The procedural validity of the rules under the APA was challenged, implicating procedural due process concerns.

    Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)
    Respondents claim that because the final rules were preceded by a document entitled 'Interim Final Rules with Request for Comments' instead of 'General Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,' they are procedurally invalid under the APA.

Key Quotes

Short excerpts from the syllabus in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania that support the summary and concepts above.

  • The Departments had the authority under the ACA to promulgate the religious and moral exemptions.
  • The IFRs' request for comments readily satisfied the APA notice requirements.
  • Concerns that the exemptions thwart Congress' intent cannot justify supplanting the text's plain meaning.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *