First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport
First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. challenged a subpoena from New Jersey's Attorney General demanding donor information, arguing it violated First Amendment rights. The district court dismissed the case for…
View PDFHencely v. Fluor Corp.
The Supreme Court reviewed whether state-law tort claims against military contractors are preempted by federal law in the context of wartime activities. The Court found that the Fourth Circuit erred…
View PDFEnbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel
The Supreme Court addressed whether the 30-day removal deadline under 28 U.S.C. §1446(b)(1) is subject to equitable tolling. The Court found that the text, structure, and context of §1446(b)(1) indicate…
View PDFDistrict of Columbia v. R.W.
The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the D.C. Court of Appeals, holding that Officer Vanterpool had reasonable suspicion to stop R.W. based on the totality of circumstances. The officer…
View PDFChevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish
The Supreme Court addressed whether Chevron's crude-oil production during World War II was related to its federal duties under the federal officer removal statute. The Court found a close relationship…
View PDFChiles v. Salazar
Kaley Chiles challenged a Colorado law prohibiting conversion therapy for minors, arguing it violated her First Amendment rights. The Supreme Court found the law regulated speech based on viewpoint, requiring…
View PDFRico v. United States
In Rico v. United States, the Supreme Court addressed whether a defendant's abscondment automatically extends the term of supervised release. The Court reversed the Ninth Circuit's decision, finding that the…
View PDFZorn v. Linton
The Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit's decision, granting qualified immunity to Sergeant Jacob Zorn in a case involving alleged excessive force during a protest arrest. The Court found that…
View PDFOlivier v. City of Brandon
The Supreme Court considered whether Gabriel Olivier's suit against the City of Brandon could proceed under 42 U.S.C. §1983, challenging an ordinance that restricted his preaching activities. The Court reviewed…
View PDFGalette v. New Jersey Transit Corp.
The Supreme Court addressed whether the New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJ Transit) qualifies as an arm of the State of New Jersey, thereby entitling it to sovereign immunity. The Court…
View PDFUrias-Orellana v. Bondi
The Supreme Court addressed whether courts of appeals must apply the substantial-evidence standard when reviewing the Board of Immigration Appeals' determination of persecution under the Immigration and Nationality Act. The…
View PDFGeo Group, Inc. v. Menocal
The Supreme Court ruled on the appealability of a pretrial order denying Yearsley protection for GEO Group, a federal contractor. The Court determined that Yearsley provides a merits defense, not…
View PDFVillarreal v. Texas
The Supreme Court addressed the balance between a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel and the trial's truth-seeking function in Villarreal v. Texas. The Court affirmed that a qualified conferral…
View PDFPostal Service v. Konan
The Supreme Court addressed whether the United States retains sovereign immunity for claims involving intentional nondelivery of mail under the Federal Tort Claims Act's postal exception. The Court concluded that…
View PDFLearning Resources, Inc. v. Trump
The Supreme Court addressed whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) authorizes the President to impose tariffs. The Court concluded that IEEPA does not grant such authority, emphasizing that…
View PDFKlein v. Martin
In Klein v. Martin, the Supreme Court reviewed a Fourth Circuit decision affirming habeas relief for Charles Brandon Martin. The Court reversed the decision, finding that the state appellate court's…
View PDFConey Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton
The Supreme Court addressed whether the reasonable-time requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1) applies to motions seeking relief from allegedly void judgments under Rule 60(b)(4). Coney Island Auto…
View PDFEllingburg v. United States
In Ellingburg v. United States, the Supreme Court addressed whether the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA) constitutes criminal punishment under the Ex Post Facto Clause. The Court determined that restitution…
View PDFBerk v. Choy
The Supreme Court ruled that Delaware's affidavit requirement for medical malpractice suits does not apply in federal court. The decision was based on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically…
View PDFBost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections
The Supreme Court reviewed whether Congressman Michael Bost and other candidates had standing to challenge Illinois's election procedures for counting mail-in ballots received after election day. The Court determined that…
View PDFCase v. Montana
In Case v. Montana, the Supreme Court addressed whether police officers' warrantless entry into a home was justified under the Fourth Amendment's emergency aid exception. The officers entered William Case's…
View PDFBarrett v. United States
The Supreme Court reviewed whether a single act violating both 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i) and § 924(j) can result in two convictions. The Second Circuit had allowed for dual convictions,…
View PDFBowe v. United States
The Supreme Court reviewed Michael S. Bowe's efforts to obtain postconviction relief from a mandatory 10-year sentence under § 924(c). The Court examined whether § 2244(b)(3)(E) applies to federal prisoners,…
View PDFClark v. Sweeney
The Supreme Court reviewed a decision by the Fourth Circuit which had granted relief to Jeremiah Sweeney on a claim not asserted by him. The Court reversed the Fourth Circuit's…
View PDFFree Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton
The Supreme Court reviewed the constitutionality of Texas H. B. 1181, which requires age verification for accessing sexually explicit content online. The Court applied intermediate scrutiny, determining that the law…
View PDFSupreme Court Cases
Why Your Voice Matters
The opinions of voters like you are shared with media outlets, helping shape public discussion. Your input can guide elections and influence how leaders make decisions that reflect the will of the people.
Polls are an important way to understand what people think about key issues. They show trends, highlight public concerns, and give everyone a chance to be heard. By taking part, you help ensure that policies and decisions are based on real opinions, not assumptions.
Your voice helps build transparency, trust, and accountability in how decisions are made. Every vote and every answer counts.
