City and County of San Francisco v. EPA
View Official PDFBelow are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in City and County of San Francisco v. EPA and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).
Summary
A short, plain-English overview of City and County of San Francisco v. EPA.
The Supreme Court addressed whether the EPA could impose 'end-result' requirements in NPDES permits under the Clean Water Act. The Court determined that Section 1311(b)(1)(C) does not authorize such provisions, emphasizing that the EPA must set specific rules for permittees to follow. The decision reversed the Ninth Circuit's ruling, which had upheld the EPA's authority to impose these requirements.
Holding
The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in City and County of San Francisco v. EPA.
The Court held that Section 1311(b)(1)(C) does not authorize the EPA to include 'end-result' provisions in NPDES permits.
Constitutional Concepts
These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in City and County of San Francisco v. EPA. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.
-
Why Administrative Law is relevant to City and County of San Francisco v. EPA
The case primarily deals with the limits of EPA's authority under the Clean Water Act, which is a matter of administrative law.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)Held: Section 1311(b)(1)(C) does not authorize the EPA to include 'end-result' provisions in NPDES permits.
-
Why Nondelegation is relevant to City and County of San Francisco v. EPA
The Court's decision implies a nondelegation issue by emphasizing that Congress did not authorize the EPA to impose certain requirements, suggesting limits on the delegation of legislative power.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)Determining what steps a permittee must take to ensure that water quality standards are met is the EPA's responsibility, and Congress has given it the tools needed to make that determination.
-
Why State–Federal Power is relevant to City and County of San Francisco v. EPA
The case involves the allocation of regulatory authority between federal and state entities under the Clean Water Act.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)San Francisco argued that the end-result requirements exceed the EPA's statutory authority, but the Ninth Circuit denied the City's petition for review.
Key Quotes
Short excerpts from the syllabus in City and County of San Francisco v. EPA that support the summary and concepts above.
Section 1311(b)(1)(C) does not authorize the EPA to include 'end-result' provisions in NPDES permits.
Determining what steps a permittee must take to ensure that water quality standards are met is the EPA's responsibility.
The Government's interpretation would undo what Congress plainly sought to achieve when it scrapped the WPCA's backward-looking approach.