Trump v. United States
View Official PDFBelow are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in Trump v. United States and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).
Summary
A short, plain-English overview of Trump v. United States.
The Supreme Court addressed whether a former President can be prosecuted for official acts taken during their presidency. The Court concluded that a former President has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within their exclusive constitutional authority and presumptive immunity for other official acts. The case was remanded to determine the nature of the conduct alleged in the indictment.
Holding
The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in Trump v. United States.
The Court held that a former President is entitled to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within their exclusive constitutional authority and presumptive immunity for other official acts.
Constitutional Concepts
These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in Trump v. United States. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.
-
Why Executive Power is relevant to Trump v. United States
The case primarily concerns the scope of the President's constitutional authority and limits on presidential action, particularly regarding immunity from prosecution for official acts.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)We conclude that under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power requires that a former President have some immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts during his tenure in office.
-
Why Judicial Review is relevant to Trump v. United States
The Court exercises its power of judicial review to interpret the scope of presidential immunity and the separation of powers.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)We are called upon to consider whether and under what circumstances such a prosecution may proceed. Doing so requires careful assessment of the scope of Presidential power under the Constitution.
Key Quotes
Short excerpts from the syllabus in Trump v. United States that support the summary and concepts above.
The President is absolutely immune from criminal prosecution for conduct within his exclusive sphere of constitutional authority.
There is no immunity for unofficial acts.
The separation of powers principles explicated in our precedent necessitate at least a presumptive immunity from criminal prosecution for a President's acts within the outer perimeter of his official responsibility.