District of Columbia v. R.W.
View Official PDFBelow are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in District of Columbia v. R.W. and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).
Summary
A short, plain-English overview of District of Columbia v. R.W..
The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the D.C. Court of Appeals, holding that Officer Vanterpool had reasonable suspicion to stop R.W. based on the totality of circumstances. The officer observed suspicious behavior, including two passengers fleeing and R.W. attempting to drive away with an open door. The Court emphasized the need to consider all factors together rather than in isolation.
Holding
The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in District of Columbia v. R.W..
The Court held that Officer Vanterpool had reasonable suspicion to stop R.W. based on the totality of the circumstances.
Constitutional Concepts
These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in District of Columbia v. R.W.. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.
-
Why Search and Seizure is relevant to District of Columbia v. R.W.
The case centers on whether the officer had reasonable suspicion to justify a seizure under the Fourth Amendment.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)The District of Columbia Court of Appeals held that Officer Vanterpool, by stopping R. W. without reasonable suspicion, violated the Fourth Amendment.
-
Why Procedural Due Process is relevant to District of Columbia v. R.W.
The case involves the procedural aspect of whether the evidence obtained after the stop should be suppressed, which relates to fair procedures.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)R. W. moved to suppress the evidence obtained after he was stopped.
Key Quotes
Short excerpts from the syllabus in District of Columbia v. R.W. that support the summary and concepts above.
The totality-of-the-circumstances test, however, 'precludes this sort of divide-and-conquer analysis.'
Reasonable suspicion 'need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.'
The whole is often greater than the sum of its parts—especially when the parts are viewed in isolation.