Sripetch v. SEC
View Official PDFBelow are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in Sripetch v. SEC and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).
Summary
A short, plain-English overview of Sripetch v. SEC.
The Supreme Court addressed whether the SEC must show pecuniary loss to investors before obtaining disgorgement. The Court concluded that such a showing is not required, aligning with traditional equitable principles. This decision resolves a split among the Courts of Appeals regarding the SEC's disgorgement authority.
Holding
The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in Sripetch v. SEC.
The Court held that a showing of pecuniary loss to investors is not required before the SEC may obtain a disgorgement award.
Constitutional Concepts
These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in Sripetch v. SEC. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.
-
Why Remedies and Relief is relevant to Sripetch v. SEC
The case primarily deals with the scope of the SEC's ability to obtain disgorgement as a form of equitable relief.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)A showing of pecuniary loss to investors is not required before the SEC may obtain a disgorgement award.
-
Why Judicial Review is relevant to Sripetch v. SEC
The Court reviews and interprets statutory provisions related to the SEC's authority to seek disgorgement.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)The Court’s analysis begins with two statutory provisions, 15 U. S. C. §§78u(d)(5) and 78u(d)(7).
-
Why Administrative Law is relevant to Sripetch v. SEC
The case involves the SEC's authority and the application of equitable principles in administrative enforcement actions.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)Section 78u(d)(5) allows the SEC to obtain 'any equitable relief that may be appropriate or necessary for the benefit of investors.'
Key Quotes
Short excerpts from the syllabus in Sripetch v. SEC that support the summary and concepts above.
A showing of pecuniary loss to investors is not required before the SEC may obtain a disgorgement award.
Courts sitting in equity have long issued remedies designed to 'depriv[e] wrongdoers of their net profits from unlawful activity.'
Equity traditionally prefers the first outcome, not the second.