Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco
View Official PDFBelow are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).
Summary
A short, plain-English overview of Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco.
The Supreme Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted in the case involving the Public Charge Rule. The case raised questions about administrative law and procedural due process related to the government's repeal of the rule without notice-and-comment procedures. The Court did not address the merits of the petitioners' arguments regarding intervention in the litigation.
Holding
The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco.
The Court held that the writ of certiorari was dismissed as improvidently granted.
Constitutional Concepts
These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.
-
Why Administrative Law is relevant to Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco
The case involves questions about the government's compliance with administrative law principles, particularly in the context of repealing a regulation without notice-and-comment procedures.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)The most fundamental is whether the Government's actions, all told, comport with the principles of administrative law.
-
Why Standing is relevant to Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco
The case involves the question of whether the petitioners should have been permitted to intervene in the litigation, which is related to standing and the right to participate in a case.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)Petitioners argue that the answer is yes, in light of the Government's actions.
-
Why Procedural Due Process is relevant to Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco
The case raises issues about whether the government followed proper procedures in repealing the Public Charge Rule, implicating procedural due process concerns.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)This allowed the Government to circumvent the usual and important requirement, under the Administrative Procedure Act, that a regulation originally promulgated using notice and comment... may only be repealed through notice and comment.
Key Quotes
Short excerpts from the syllabus in Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco that support the summary and concepts above.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
These maneuvers raise a host of important questions.
It has become clear that this mare's nest could stand in the way of our reaching the question presented.