Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish
View Official PDFBelow are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).
Summary
A short, plain-English overview of Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish.
The Supreme Court addressed whether Chevron's crude-oil production during World War II was related to its federal duties under the federal officer removal statute. The Court found a close relationship between Chevron's oil production and its avgas refining duties for the military, satisfying the 'relating to' requirement. The decision vacated the Fifth Circuit's ruling and remanded the case.
Holding
The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish.
The Court held that Chevron plausibly alleged a close relationship between its crude-oil production and its federal avgas refining duties, satisfying the 'relating to' requirement of the federal officer removal statute.
Constitutional Concepts
These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.
-
Why State–Federal Power is relevant to Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish
The case involves the allocation of authority between state and federal governments, specifically regarding the federal officer removal statute.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)Chevron removed the suit to federal court under the federal officer removal statute, arguing that the suit 'relat[ed] to' its contractual duties to refine crude oil into avgas for the military during the war.
-
Why Preemption is relevant to Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish
The case discusses whether federal duties preempt state court jurisdiction under the federal officer removal statute.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)Held: Chevron has plausibly alleged a close relationship between its challenged crude-oil production and the performance of its federal avgas refining duties—not a tenuous, remote, or peripheral one—and has therefore satisfied the 'relating to' requirement of the federal officer removal statute.
Key Quotes
Short excerpts from the syllabus in Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish that support the summary and concepts above.
"Chevron has plausibly alleged a close relationship between its challenged crude-oil production and the performance of its federal avgas refining duties."
"The phrase 'relating to' sweeps broadly, meaning 'to stand in some relation; to have bearing or concern; to pertain; refer; to bring into association with or connection with.'"
"The Government emphasized the importance of increasing Chevron’s crude-oil production to support avgas refining as part of the war effort."