Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
View Official PDFBelow are plain-language sections to help you understand what the Court decided in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and why it matters. Quotes are taken from the syllabus (the Court’s short summary at the start of the opinion).
Summary
A short, plain-English overview of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
The Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization addressed the constitutionality of Mississippi's Gestational Age Act, which restricts abortions after 15 weeks. The Court overruled Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, concluding that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. The decision returns the authority to regulate abortion to the states and their elected representatives.
Holding
The single most important “bottom line” of what the Court decided in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
The Court held that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion and overruled Roe and Casey.
Constitutional Concepts
These are the Constitution-related themes that appear in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Click a concept to see other cases that involve the same idea.
-
Why Substantive Due Process is relevant to Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
The Court's decision centers on whether the Constitution confers a right to obtain an abortion under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.
-
Why State–Federal Power is relevant to Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
The decision emphasizes returning the authority to regulate abortion to the states and their elected representatives.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion.
-
Why Equal Protection is relevant to Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
The Court discusses and rejects the argument that the right to abortion is supported by the Equal Protection Clause.
Syllabus excerpt (verbatim)Others have suggested that support can be found in the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, but that theory is squarely foreclosed by the Court's precedents.
Key Quotes
Short excerpts from the syllabus in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that support the summary and concepts above.
"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives."
"The Court finds that the right to abortion is not deeply rooted in the Nation's history and tradition."
"Roe either ignored or misstated this history, and Casey declined to reconsider Roe's faulty historical analysis."